2025:CGHC:34711 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7869 of 2025 Takeshwar Singh Verma S/o Shri Bisauha Ram Verma Aged About 53 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher In Primary School, Mata Dewalaya A-Block Bhatapara, District - Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Directorate Of Public Instructions, Through Its Director, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The District Education Officer, District Baloda Bazaar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - The District Education Officer, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - The Collector, District - Baloda Bazaar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 6 - The Collector, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 7 - Joint Director, Raipur Division, Public Instructions, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Ms Akanksha Singh, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms Smita Jha, PL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 21.07.2025 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner herein is a handicapped person, suffering from 100% loss of vision. The petitioner is presently posted on the post of Assistant Teacher in Primary School, Mata Dewalaya ‘A’ Block-Bhatapara, District-Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Wps 7869 of 2025 2 and now he has been transferred to other place. She would further submits that there are posts lying vacant at the nearby schools in which he is now working, for which he has moved representations but they have not been decided yet. Therefore, it is prayed that this petition may be disposed of directing the petitioner to make fresh representation before respondent-1, to consider and decide the said representation within the stipulated period. 2. The above prayer made by the counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for respondents/State. 3. In view of above submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, present writ petition stands disposed of with liberty to petitioner herein, to submit a fresh representation raising all grounds as raised in this petition before respondent-1 within two weeks and upon submission of such representation, respondent-1 is further directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner in accordance with relevant rules and law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four months. 4. With the aforesaid observation, present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma