The Hiramandalam Gram Panchayat, v. The Superintending Engineer
WP/38871/2013 · 2025-07-09
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35066 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 35066 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010552092013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 38871/2013 Between:
1. THE HIRAMANDALAM GRAM PANCHAYAT,, REP.BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER K.SATYAM S/O CHINNAPPAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O HIRAMANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LIMITED, OPERATION CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. THE ASSISTANT ACCOUNTS OFFICER, ELECTRICITY REVENUE OFFICE, APEPDCL SRIKAKULAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. THE EASTERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. THE GOVERNMENT OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHATYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT (PTS.IV) DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declare the action of the respondents in issuing the impugned Letter No. SE/O/SKL/SAO/AO(Rev)/JAO/LT/D.No.396/13, dated 19-07-2013 and all consequential proceedings as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the G.O.Rt.No. 80, dated 17-01-2009 and consequential G.O.Rt.No. 1190, dated 18-07-2013 and consequentially this Hontle Court
may be pleased to set aside the impugned order dated 19-07-2013 and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 48314 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Letter No. SE/O/SKL/SAO/AO(Rev)/JAO/LT/D.No.396/13, dated 19-07-2013 and consequential proceedings thereto issued by the respondents pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 378 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed on dated 31-12-2013 In W.P.MP.No. 48314 of 2013 W.P.No. 38871 of 2013 Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M R TAGORE Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
2. P ANAND SESHU (SC FOR APEPDCL)
3.
METTA CHENDRA SEKHAR RAO The Court made the following ORDER:
Sri Venkat Rao, learned counsel representing Sri M.R. Tagore, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the same has rendered infructuous. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________ SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J Date: 10.07.2025 ikn
255
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION NO: 38871 OF 2013
Date: 10.07.2025 ikn