IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2553 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Ashok Kumar …….Petitioner Versus HRTC & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rahul Gathania, Advocate. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record communication dated 11.12.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Divisional Manager, HRTC, Una, Himachal Pradesh, Mr. Rahul Gathania, learned counsel representing the respondents, states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, sums of Rs.8,61,120/- and Rs.10,97,928/- stand paid to the petitioner on account of leave encashment as well as DCRG. He further states that interest on account of delayed payment as per statutes, if not already released, shall be released in favour of the petitioner expeditiously. 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid document, which is taken on record, coupled with the fair statement made by learned counsel representing the respondents, this Court sees no reason to keep the present petition alive and accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to ensure that interest on account of delayed payment, if not already released, shall be released in favour of the petitioner expeditiously, preferably within six weeks from today, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the present proceedings revived, so that appropriate action, in accordance with law, is taken towards implementation of the judgment/ order, sought to be executed in the instant proceedings. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 12, 2025 (sunil)