Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35060 (KAR)

NAYANI SOWMYA v. SRI YOGESH

CCC/1176/2024 · 2025-01-06

M I Arun

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:36-DB CCC No. 1176 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR N. V. ANJARIA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN CCC NO. 1176 OF 2024 (CIVIL) BETWEEN: 1. NAYANI SOWMYA W/O N BHADRINATH AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS PROPRITRIX: SRI ARUNACHALESHWARA TRANSPORT, NO 16-140 UMANAGAR, OLD TOWN ANANTAPURAM-515 001 ANDHRA PRADESH. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. SRIKANTH A., ADVOCATE) And: 1. SRI YOGESH THE TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER-CUM- CHAIRPERSON, KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1ST FLOOR, BMTC TTMC BUILDING SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE-560 027. 2. SRI C T MURTHY THE SECRETARY Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:36-DB CCC No. 1176 of 2024 KARNATAKA STATE TRANSPORT AUTHORITY 1ST FLOOR, BMTC TTMC BUILDING SHANTHINAGAR BANGALORE-560 027. 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY SECRETARY TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001. …ACCUSED (BY SMT. PRAMODHINI KISHAN, AGA FOR RESPONDENT NO.3) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 11 AND 12 OF CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER DATED 9.1.2024 PASSED IN W.P.NO.25000/2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND BE PLEASED TO PUNISH THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING THE ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA and HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:36-DB CCC No. 1176 of 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. JUSTICE N. V. ANJARIA) Learned advocate Mr. A. Srikanth for the complainant files the memo dated 06.01.2025 in which it is stated that since the order under contempt is complied with, the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the present contempt proceedings. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed as not surviving. SD/- (N. V. ANJARIA) CHIEF JUSTICE SD/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 1