RAVEENA CHOUDHARY @ DEEPSHIKHA D/O SHRI RANDHIR SNGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/962/2025 · 2025-01-22
Anil Kumar Upman
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3506 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3506 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 962/2025 Raveena Choudhary @ Deepshikha D/o Shri Randhir Sngh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Nagla Shera Sonkh, Thana Mangori District Mathura (U.p.) . At Present As Tenant Gali No. 16 40 Feet Road, Molarband Extension Badarpur New Delhi. (The Accused Presently In District Jail Bharatpur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 22/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.159/2024 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar (Bharatpur), District Bharatpur for the offence punishable under Section 310(2) of BNS. Charge-sheet has been filed for offences under Sections 310(2) & 111(4) of BNS. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that no evidence is available on record against the petitioner. Neither any recovery has been made from the petitioner nor any identification parade was conducted in this matter. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since
03.10.2024. Charge-sheet has been filed, trial will take time in its
(2 of 3) [CRLMB-962/2025] conclusion and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that two other cases have been registered against him. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that petitioner is in custody since 03.10.2024; charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6.
This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner Raveena Choudhary @ Deepshikha D/o Shri Randhir Sngh, shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and she shall mark his presence in first week of every month, till trial is
(3 of 3) [CRLMB-962/2025] concluded. 8. If breach of this condition is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J ANAND TANWAR /85