Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010551692018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 26117/2018 Between: Nilesh Gupta ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M V DURGA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K ANANDA RAO
2. BALAJI MEDAMALLI ( SC FOR VMC AP )
3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following:
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
W.P.No.26117 of 2018
ORDER:
This petition is filed declaring the action of the Second Respondent in trying to grant trade license to enable the Third Respondent or anyone claiming through her to run service apartments and eating house in Flat Nos.B1, B2, C1, C2 and E2, EL Square, 16th Left Cross, Bharati Nagar, Vijayawada—520008, Andhra Pradesh and in not taking any action on the material alterations being carried out illegally in the said flats contrary to the Sanction Plan BA.No.02254/2015/G6, dated 31.12.2015 and in violation of Sections 108, 109 of the Andhra Pradesh Capital Region Development Authority Act, 2014 (A.P. Act No.11 of 2014) and the Building Rules published vide G.O.Ms.No.168, dated 07.04.2012 Municipal Administration and Urban Development (M) Department and G.O.Ms.No.119, dated 28.03.2017 in pursuance of the Representation of the Petitioner, dated 12.07.2018 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 243W, 243ZE and 300-A read with Schedule-XII of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to grant any trade licenses and forthwith take action on the material alterations being carried out by the Third Respondent contrary to the Sanction Plan BA.No.02254/2015/G6, dated 31.12.2015 in the said flats.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
3
3. Permission as sought for is accorded.
4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions if any shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 23.04.2025 SCS
4
22
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 26117/2018
DATE:- 23.04.2025
SCS