IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2184 of 2025 Date of Decision: 11.11.2025 __________________________________________________________________ Sanjeev Kumar ……...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Vijay Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General. __________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 25.10.2025, issued under the signatures of Deputy Conservator of Forests, Suket Forest Division, Sundernagar, enclosing therewith copy of office orders dated 20.08.2025 and 25.10.2025, learned Deputy Advocate General states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, petitioner has been granted benefit of work charge status on notional basis from due date and his pay has also been re-fixed. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication as well as office orders dated 20.08.2025 and 25.10.2025, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned Deputy 2 Advocate General and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly the same is disposed of. November 11, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge