Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35053 (AP)

PALLA RAMAKRISHNA, ANANTAPUR DT., v. STATE OF AP., REP. PP AND 12 OTHRS.,

CRLRC/1218/2013 · 2025-02-03

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010551152013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between: Palla Ramakrishna, Anantapur Dt., State Of Ap Rep Pp And 12 Othrs and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1218/2013 Palla Ramakrishna, Anantapur Dt., ...PETITIONER AND State Of Ap Rep Pp And 12 Othrs and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) following: IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3521] THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) ORDER: The present revision is filed against the order dated 18.04.2013 in Crl.MP.No.133/2013, on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kadiri. 2. Mr. M.Vinod Kumar, learned counsel, representing Mr. T.C.Krishnan, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ Dr. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J Dt: 03.02.2025 TJN 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1218/2013 03.02.2024 TJN