Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.16997 of 2025 Date of decision: 31.10.2025 Kamal Jeet ...Petitioner. Versus HRTC & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Gambhir Singh Chauhan & Mr. Ganesh Barowalia Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, appears and accepts service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Carpainter in the respondent/HRTC. His grievance is to the office order dated 17.10.2025, whereunder he has been transferred from Nahan Unit to Tara Devi Unit. The transfer has been effected vice one Mr. Nagender Singh, who has not been impleaded as a party in the writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is faced with difficult family circumstances and is himself also suffering from cardiac ailments; These adverse -2- circumstances have been highlighted by the petitioner in his representation dated 29.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) preferred to respondent No.1 seeking his adjustment, however, till date, the said representation has not been considered and decided. 4. Looking to the fact that petitioner has admittedly completed his normal tenure at Nahan Unit, but also keeping in view the adverse family circumstances highlighted by the petitioner in his representation, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.1/competent authority to consider and decide the petitioner’s representation, in accordance with law and applicable Policy, within a period of three weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 31st October, 2025 Judge (sunil)