Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3504 (RAJ)

AMJAD S/O PATMAL KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/670/2025 · 2025-01-17

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:2464] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 670/2025 1. Amjad S/o Patmal Khan, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Khohra, Police Station Kaithwada. 2. Mufid S/o Iliyas, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Village Khohra, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. 3. Momin S/o Aslam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Khohra, Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. R.S. Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 17/01/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The accused- petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.172/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offences under Sections 111(2)(a), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2) (a) of BNS and Sections 66D and 66E of Information Technology (Amended) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, the accused-petitioners are in custody since long and the trial/investigation of the case may take considerable time, therefore, their bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. [2025:RJ-JP:2464] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-670/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate, accused-petitioners are in custody since long, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely:- 1. Amjad S/o Patmal Khan, 2. Mufid S/o Iliyas and 3. Momin S/o Aslam in connection with FIR No. 172/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/35