Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35035 (HP)

AKSHAY KUMAR v. HPSEBL AND OTHERS

CWP/19648/2025 · 2025-12-15

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.19648 of 2025 Decided on: 15.12.2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Akshay Kumar …..Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Raj Thakur, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Virender Singh Kanwar, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Sub-Station Attendant at HPSEBL Circle, Dalhousie, Sub-Division Rakh, Division Chamba, District Chamba, H.P. where he is statedly serving w.e.f. 30.05.2017. It is his case that he has served much more than requisite tenure at the aforesaid station. Due to adverse family circumstances, he preferred a representation on 27.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) to 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2 respondent No.1 seeking transfer. Petitioner’s grievance is that the aforesaid representation has not been considered and decided as yet. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 27.10.2025 (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua December 15, 2025 Judge yogesh