- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:4703 WP No. 30096 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 30096 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. ABDULA SALAM S/O N. ABDUL KHADER AGE 66 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.855/C, 6/1, OLD PANCHAYATH ROAD, OPPOSITE BWSSB OFFICE, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU-560022 2. ABDUL SUBHAN. A S/O ABDUL KHADER. N AGE 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.174, 13TH B MAIN ROAD, HMT LAYOUT, MATHIKERE, BENGALURU-560054 3. SHINGATI MOHAMMED HASHIM S/O LATE S.A. RAHIM AGE 62 YEARS RESIDING AT NO. 1401, 11TH MAIN, 33RD CROSS, JAYANAGAR, 4TH BLOCK, BENGALURU-560011 4. AMJAD KHAN S/O GHOUSE KHAN AGE 64 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.170/1, GAYATRI TEMPLE ROAD, YESHWANTHPURA, BENGALURU-560022 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. UJJWAL.G.S., FOR SRI. MOHAMAD AYUB ALI., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:4703 WP No. 30096 of 2024 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 4TH FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-01. 2. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R.SQUARE, BANGALORE - 560 002 3. ASSISTANT REVENUE OFFICER MATHIKERE SUB- DIVISION BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE- 560022 4. CENTRAL MUSIM ASSOCIATION HAMEED SHAH COMPOUND COMPANY INCORPORATION UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956 OTC ROAD CROSS, CUBBONPET, BANGLAORE-560002 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA., AGA FOR R-1; SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-2 & R-3; R-4 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO DIRECT R-2 AND 3 TO FORTHWITH UNSEAL THE PETITIONERS SHOPS AND RESTORE POSSESSION TO THE PETITIONERS, ALLOWING THEM TO RESUME THEIR BUSINESS OPERATIONS, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:4703 WP No. 30096 of 2024 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike ('the BBMP') submits that the property tax in respect of the property in question has been paid and the BBMP has also received the property and the petitioners are being permitted to proceed with their business. 2. In the light of the said submission, the prayer sought for in the Writ Petition would not survive for consideration. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become unnecessary. 3. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE hnm List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0