Sarita Rani 2025.02.10 18:28 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order RSA No.2134 of 2000 (O&M) 2025:PHHC: 019294 2. Against the aforesaid findings, the defendants have approached this Court by filing the present regular second appeal. 3. Learned State counsel for the appellants could not point out any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. It is not disputed that plain ff was insured under the Policy as claimed by him and he had sustained burn injuries while performing his du es. There is nothing on record to suggest that necessary facili es for the treatment of the plain ff were available with the ESI Hospital, Faridabad or with the B.K. Hospital, Faridabad. In these circumstances, the Appellate Curt did not commit any error in holding the plain ff to be en tled of 52,290.55. Holding the present appeal to be devoid of any merits, the same is hereby dismissed. February 10, 2025 Sarita (DEEPAK GUPTA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No Sarita Rani 2025.02.10 18:28 I attest to the accuracy of this document/order