- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1028 WP No. 102013 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 102013 OF 2021 BETWEEN: CHOUGULE ASSOCIATES, REPRESENTED ARCHITECT RANDHIR, S/O RAMCHANDRA CHOUGULE , AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: ARCHITECT, R/O. 222, KAPILESHWAR ROAD, BELAGAVI-01. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANTOSH.B.RAWOOT., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, ROOM NO. 434, 4TH FLOOR, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE-01. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SMART CITY MANGALORE, 2ND FLOOR, CITY CORPORATION, M.G.ROAD, LALBAGH, MANGALORE-575 003. 3. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER (TECHNICAL), SMART CITY, 2ND FLOOR, CITY CORPORATION, M.G.ROAD, LALBAGH, MANGALORE-575 003. 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (TECHNICAL), SMART CITY, 2ND FLOOR, CITY CORPORATION, M.G.ROAD, LALBAGH, MANGLORE-575 003. 5. THE URBAN FRAME, REPRESENTED BY ANUP NAIK, Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1028 WP No. 102013 of 2021 RESIDENT OF MANNA -522, 19TH 'B' CROSS, RT NAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1; SMT. ASHVINI PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. AJAY.J.N., ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO 4; SRI. VISHWANATH HEGDE., ADVOCATE R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.1 and Smt.Ashvini Patil., counsel on behalf of Sri.Ajay.J.N., for respondents 2 to 4 have appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 06.12.2024, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petition was listed on 09.01.2025, on that day also, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1028 WP No. 102013 of 2021 petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, the petition was ordered to be listed on 10.01.2025. The petition is listed today for appearance of counsel for the petitioner. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45