Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 35017 (KAR)

PRASHANTH DEBSHARMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/12331/2024 · 2025-02-21

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:7943 CRL.P No. 12331 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12331 OF 2024 BETWEEN: PRASHANTH DEBSHARAMA S/O SURESH DEBASHARMA, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, VIJAYA BAKERY SIDE, 4TH CROSS, RAMAMURTHY NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 016 PERMANENT RESIDENT OF BHANDAR, BAGHAN, UTTAR PRADESH, WEST BENGAL - 733 132. (ACCUSED NO.2/PETITIONER IS IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY) …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVA PRASAD .S., ADVOCATE (AB)) AND: STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAMAMURTHYNAGAR P.S. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. RASHMI PATEL, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER / ACCUSED NO.2 ON BAIL IN CR.NO.177/2024 REGISTERED BY THE RAMAMURTHYNAGAR POLICE FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCE P/U/S 307, 302, 201 WITH SEC.3, 4, 5 OF IMMORAL TRAFFIC ACT SEC.7, 8, 15 OF POCSO ACT AND Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:7943 CRL.P No. 12331 of 2024 SEC.370 OF IPC ON THE FILE OF THE HONBLE FTSC-1 ADDL.CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE IN SPL.C.NO.912/2024. THIS CRL.P, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over and again called at 3.30 p.m. The matter is listed for the fourth time for compliance of office objections. 2. The order sheet dated 22.01.2025 reads as under: Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. The petition is listed for 3rd time for compliance of office objections. Inspite of that, there is no progress in the matter. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, finally, a weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. XXX - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:7943 CRL.P No. 12331 of 2024 3. Inspite of that there is neither any representation nor compliance of office objections. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BH List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2