COCP No.1383 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 227-U OM PARKASH Vs SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Present: Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 (through VC). Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions submits that the arrears towards benefit payable to the petitioner released in his favour till 01.07.2016 01.07.2016 and the actual benefits payable thereof along with interest shall be released within eight (08) weeks from today. 2. In view of the counsel for the petitioner 3. Dismissed as not pressed. 4. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of contempt petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs. the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. May 14, 2025 Atik Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1383 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: OM PARKASH ...... SHALINI SINGH NAGPAL AND OTHERS ....Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJ Mr. L.K. Gollen, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Rajeev Anand, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 and 2 (through VC). Mr. Manish Dadwal, Asstt. A.G., Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions submits that the arrears towards benefit payable to the petitioner released in his favour till 01.07.2016, whereas the 01.07.2016 and the actual benefits payable thereof along with interest shall be released within eight (08) weeks from today. In view of the aforesaid undertaking counsel for the petitioner does not press the present petition. Dismissed as not pressed. Rule stands discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of t petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be liable to pay a sum of Rs.50,000/- as cost(s) from the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of listing of revival application. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1383 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 14.05.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA for the petitioner. for respondent Nos.1 and 2 (through VC). A.G., Haryana. Learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions submits that the arrears towards benefit payable to the petitioner have been , whereas the interest for those benefits till 01.07.2016 and the actual benefits payable thereof along with interest shall be aforesaid undertaking by the respondent(s), learned does not press the present petition. Rule stands discharged. However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of t petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be as cost(s) from his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE 1 Learned counsel representing respondent Nos.1 and 2 on instructions been interest for those benefits till 01.07.2016 and the actual benefits payable thereof along with interest shall be by the respondent(s), learned However, in case the needful is not done within the aforementioned period, as per the undertaking, the petitioner would be at liberty to seek revival of t petition and in that eventuality, the erring/concerned officer would be his/her own pocket in favour of the petitioner towards litigation expenses, immediately i.e. on the first date of MOHMED ATIK 2025.05.16 11:37 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment