B K ANAND v. DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING
WP/31439/2024 · 2025-04-21
S Sunil Dutt Yadav
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34989 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34989 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16187 WP No. 31439 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 31439 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN:
B K ANAND S/O KRISHANA REDDY, AGED 43 YEARS, R/O KUPPAMPALYA VILLAGE, TAYALURU VILLAGE, MULABAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT - 563 101. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYARAMA BHATT S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560 001.
2.
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING AUTHORITY, KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR - 563 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. BOPANNA BELLIAPPA, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-SET ASIDE/QUASH Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16187 WP No. 31439 of 2024 THE APPROVAL LETTER BEARING NO. APPROVAL LETTER DTD 03.10.2023 AND REVISED PLAN APPROVAL SKETCH DTD 03.10.2023 ISSUED BY THE R-2, WERE PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-B AND B1 RESPECTIVELY TO THE WP.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER
1. Perused the order dated 09.04.2025 which reads as here under:
"No representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Perused the order dated 01.04.2025. There was no representation on behalf of the petitioner even on
01.04.2025.
It is made clear if the petitioner remains absent, Court would be constrained to pass necessary orders on the next date of hearing.
Re-list the matter on 21.04.2025."
2. It is noticed that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 01.04.2025 as well as on
09.04.2025. This court had observed that if the petitioner
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:16187 WP No. 31439 of 2024 continues to remain absent, Court would be constrained to pass necessary orders.
3. Once again, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner when the matter is called out. Accordingly, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE DHA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22