Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34985 (AP)

K.PRASAD, KRISHNA DIST. & 3 OTHERS v. GANDHAM CHANDRUDU, I.A.S., KRISHNA DIST.

CC/1291/2017 · 2025-04-08

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010548852017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1291/2017 Between: 1. K.PRASAD, KRISHNA DIST. & 3 OTHERS, S/O BHAVANA RUSHI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS PLOT NO.301, VIJAYA LAKSHMI ENCLAVE BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR, GOSALA VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. K.B.S. KIRAN, S/O K. PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, PLOT NO.301, VIJAYA LAKSHMI ENCLAVE BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR, GOSALA VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. K.S. CHAITANYA, S/O K. PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, PLOT NO.301, VIJAYA LAKSHMI ENCLAVE BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR, GOSALA VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. K. PAVAN SAI, S/O K. PRASAD, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, PLOT NO.301, VIJAYA LAKSHMI ENCLAVE BHAGATH SINGH NAGAR, GOSALA VILLAGE, PENAMALURU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GANDHAM CHANDRUDU I A S KRISHNA DIST, District Collector- Cum-Arbitrator Krishna District at Machilipatnam. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent for his willful disobedience of the orders dt: 18.1.2017 passed in WP No. 44070 of 2011, under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: The above contempt case is filed complaining about the non- implementation of the order dated 18.01.2017 in W.P.44070 of 2016. 2. Today, when the matter is listed, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the order dated 18.01.2017 in W.P.44070 of 2016 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date : 08.04.2025 TVN 169 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE No.1291 OF 2017 Date : 08.04.2025 TVN