Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34983 (AP)

Saritha Sangaraju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/28483/2025 · 2025-10-22

Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010549312025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28483 of 2025 Between: 1. SARITHA SANGARAJU,, W/O SREEKANTH DASARRAJU, AGED 35 YEARS, R/O D.NO 4/31B, K.R.KANDRIKA, KODUR, CHIYYAVARAM, KADAPA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AT AMARAVATI, 2. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, ROYACHOTI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, PULLAMPET, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring order of Refusal in proceedings No Refusal No.11/2025 dated 29.09.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, thereby refusing to register document of Sale Deed dated 29.09.2025 and keeping the same as pending document vide P.No.16/2025 dated 29.09.2025, in respect of the property in survey No.1682 and 1689 site extent of 666.66 Sq.yds of Koduru Village, Koduru Mandal of Annamayya District, inspite of the same issue covered by repeated orders of this Honble Court as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and rules framed there under and offends Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and 2 consequently to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register and release the said Sale Deed forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BALAJI MEDAMALLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “…to issue a Writ or an order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring order of Refusal in proceedings No Refusal No.11/2025 dated 29.09.2025 issued by the 3rd respondent, thereby refusing to register document of Sale Deed dated 29.09.2025 and keeping the same as pending document vide P.No.16/2025 dated 29.09.2025, in respect of the property in survey No.1682 and 1689 site extent of 666.66 Sq.yds of Koduru Village, Koduru Mandal of Annamayya District, in spite of the same issue covered by repeated orders of this Honble Court as illegal, irregular, irrational, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of the Registration Act, 1908 and rules framed there under and offends Article 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to register and release the said Sale Deed forthwith and pass such other order or orders ….” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the present issue is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 11.03.2025 in W.P.No.6134 of 2025 and he would request to pass similar orders and extend the same relief to the present writ petitioner also. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader has vehemently opposed the said request of the leaned counsel for the petitioner. 4. As seen from the contents of the affidavit filed in support of the present Writ Petition, the matter is squarely covered by the order of this Court dated 11.03.2025 in W.P.No.6134 of 2025. 4 5. Hence, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present Writ Petition in terms of the order of this Court dated 11.03.2025 in W.P.No.6134 of 2025 and for the reasons recorded therein. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. Office is directed to attach a copy of the order of this Court dated 11.03.2025 in W.P.No.6134 of 2025 to this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 23.10.2025 siva 5 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.28483 of 2025 Date: 23.10.2025 siva