Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21097 WP No. 30747 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 30747 OF 2024 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
KUM R NETRAVATHI D/O RANGAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/ AT WATER SUPPLY ASSISTANT TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNCIL HONNALE-577217. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. M S CHANDRASHEKAR BABU., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE DIRECTOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION REP BY ITS DIRECTOR 9TH FLOOR VISVESWARAIAH TOWER AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE-560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DAVANAGERE DISTRICT DAVANAGERE-577001.
3.
THE CHIEF OFFICER TOWN MUNICIPAL COUNSIL, HONNALE-577217. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B J ESHWARAPPA., AGA FOR R1 & R2:
R3 IS SERVED & UNREPRESENTED)
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21097 WP No. 30747 of 2024
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DTD.
13.08.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-J TO THE WRIT PETITION AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“Writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the representation dated 13.08.2024 as per Annexure-J to the writ petition.”
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner’s father was working as a Pourakarmika in Town Panchayathi, Channagiri. While he was in service, he died on 15.03.2014. On the basis of the request made by the petitioner, he has been appointed on compassionate grounds, as Water Supply Assistant, as per Annexure-G, dated 15.10.2015.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21097 WP No. 30747 of 2024
3. The grievance of the petitioner is that, even though the petitioner is qualified to be promoted as Second Division Assistant, his case has not been considered. Therefore, he has given a representation, dated 13.08.2024, vide Annexure-J to respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Since no action has been taken, the petitioner is before this Court.
4. The learned AGA for the State submits that, if this Court grants some reasonable time, the representation of the petitioner would be considered, in accordance with law.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, respondent Nos. 1 and 2 are directed to consider the representation submitted by the petitioner vide Annexure-J dated 13.08.2024, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:21097 WP No. 30747 of 2024
With the above observations, the writ petition stands
disposed of.
Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 60