Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34971 (CAL)

RANJIT KUMAR MALIK v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/18420/2024 · 2025-06-11

Kausik Chanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

5 11-06-2025 AKG Ct. 15 WPA 18420 of 2024 Ranjit Kumar Malik Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Snehasis Jana …for the Petitioner Mr. Manabendra Thakur, Mr. Swarup Kumar Ghosh, Mr. Poulami Chakraborty …for the Municipality Mr. Santimoy Bhattacharyya …for Respondent Nos. 7 to 9 Ms. Sipra Majumdar, Ms. Somashree Dey …for the State It appears that the allegation of the petitioner is without any substance. Respondent nos. 7 to 9 in fact have a sanctioned plan for their residential building. A copy of the sanctioned plan has been made over to the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the Municipality also supports respondent nos. 7 to 9. He submits that respondent nos. 7 to 9 have duly obtained sanctioned plan from the Municipality for constructing their residential houses on plot no. 2728, Mouza – Srirampur within the jurisdiction of Ghatal Municipality. Accordingly, WPA 18420 of 2024 is dismissed. Urgent certified website copies of this order, if applied 2 for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities. (Kausik Chanda, J.)