- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:2640 WP No. 30443 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 30443 OF 2024 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. B N LOKESH S/O LATE B.H NARASIMAHIAH R/AT NO.58, RESERVOIR STREET BASAVANAGUDI BENGALURU-560004 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. HARISH H V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BENGALURU, N.R.SQURE, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU- 560002. BY ITS COMMISSIONER 2. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE SOUTH BENGALURU JAYANAGAR 1ST BLOCK BENGALURU-560008 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER SOUTH BBMP PADMANABHANAGAR KUMAR SWAMY LAYOUT BENGALURU -560078 4. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER YADIYUR BENGALURU -560082 Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:2640 WP No. 30443 of 2024 5. M/S ELEMENTS SIGNATURE HOME PARTNERSHIP FIRM REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNERS A) SRI. KASHINATH B) V ASHOK KUMAR REGISTERED OFFICE AT UNIT NO.303, THIRD FLOOR, BRIGADE CORNER, NO. 73/8, S. KARIYAPPA ROAD YADIYUR CIRCLE, 7TH BLOCK, JAYNAGAR-560082 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R-1 TO R-4) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO DIRECTIONS TO RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE REPRESENTATION GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER, VIDE ANNEXURE –A1 TO A4 DTD 05.11.2024 COMPLAINING/OBJECTING ABOUT THE ILLEGAL SANCTIONED PLAN, WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY WITHIN A TIME FRAME TO BE FIXED BY THIS HONBLE COURT, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The prayer in this Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to consider the representations given by the petitioner vide Annexures-A1 to A4 complaining about the illegal sanctioned plan. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:2640 WP No. 30443 of 2024 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the representations of the petitioner have been considered and appropriate action has been initiated. 3. In the light of the above, the prayer in this Writ Petition would not survive for consideration and the Writ Petition is dismissed as having become unnecessary. 4. In view of the disposal of the petition, all pending interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of. SD/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 24