Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34967 (JHR)

RAVI KUMAR ALIAS RAVI KUMAR RAM v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6639/2025 · 2025-11-25

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:35158 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6639 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6639 of 2025 ---- Ravi Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Ram, son of Raju Ram, aged about 30 years, resident of Radio Station Road, Drama Division Campus, Ward No.12, PO – Lalbag, PS – Darbhanga Nagar, District – Darbhanga, Bihar .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pinki Kumari, daughter of Tulsi Ram, resident of Qtr. No.306, Street – 19, Sector – 9/C, PO – Sector – 9, PS – Harla, PS – Bokaro Steel City, District – Bokaro, Jharkhand .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Ankur Anand, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Advocate ---- 04/25.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Harla P.S. Case No.118 of 2025, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 303(2), 89, 85, 351(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband of the informant and there are general and omnibus allegation of torture and demand of dowry. He further submits that entire family members have been made accused. He then submits that the petitioner has replied to the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. He also submits that 2025:JHHC:35158 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6639 of 2025 so far miscarriage is concerned that allegation is made against accused Nos.4 and 5, who are brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State submits that the petitioner happened to be the husband. 5. Considering that the petitioner happened to be the husband and there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and the entire family members have been made accused and the petitioner has replied to the notice under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the allegation of miscarriage is made against accused Nos.4 and 5, who are brother-in-law and sister-in-law of the informant, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bokaro in connection with Harla P.S. Case No.118 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 25.11.2025 Sangam/