APHC010548112003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17296/2003 Between: 1. JUVVANAPUDI JOANNES, S/O ASIRVADHAM R/O TELAPROLU, UNGUTUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 1. BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED, CORPORATE OFFICE, 116/2, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE, REP., BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, 2. THE MANAGER PA RAVINDRANATH TAGORE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, VIJAYAWADA. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 2 in once again holding the Written Test to fill up on 20-8-2003 without finalizing and declaring the results of the interview hold on 11-3-2003 to the said post on the basis of Written Test held on 20 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and India and issue consequential direction to the respondents to appoint me as Junior Supervisor (Security) on the basis of interview hold on 11 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 17296/2003 JUVVANAPUDI JOANNES, S/O ASIRVADHAM R/O TELAPROLU, UNGUTUR MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED, CORPORATE OFFICE, 116/2, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE, REP., BY ITS MANAGING THE MANAGER PA BHARAT, ELECTRONICS LIMITED, RAVINDRANATH TAGORE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the tances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 2 in once again holding the Written Test to fill up the post of the Junior Supervisor (Security) 2003 without finalizing and declaring the results of the interview hold 2003 to the said post on the basis of Written Test held on 20 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential direction to the respondents to appoint me as Junior Supervisor (Security) on the basis of interview hold on 11-3-2003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI JUVVANAPUDI JOANNES, S/O ASIRVADHAM R/O TELAPROLU, ...PETITIONER BHARAT ELECTRONICS LIMITED, CORPORATE OFFICE, 116/2, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE, REP., BY ITS MANAGING BHARAT, ELECTRONICS LIMITED, RAVINDRANATH TAGORE MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE ZILLA SAINIK WELFARE OFFICER, KRISHNA DISTRICT, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the tances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction declaring the action of the respondent No.1 and 2 in once again the post of the Junior Supervisor (Security) 2003 without finalizing and declaring the results of the interview hold 2003 to the said post on the basis of Written Test held on 20-1-2003 21 of the Constitution of India and issue consequential direction to the respondents to appoint me as 2003 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 3060 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders made in WP No. 17296 of 2003 dated 20-8-2003 IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 21499 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to conduct written test once again on 20.8.2003 to fill up the post of Junior Supervisor (Security) pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2003(WPMP 93490 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K CHIDAMBARAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K SRINIVASA MURTHY 2. D RAVISHANKAR RAO 3 The Court made the following order: Sri V.Jagadish, learned counsel, representing Sri K.Chidambaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 11.08.2025 MP 4 97 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO:17296 of 2003 Date: 11.08.2025 MP