Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010548222024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No: 549/2025 Between: P Surya Rao ...PETITIONER AND M M Nayak Ias ...CONTEMNOR
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M S P REDDY
Counsel for the Contemnor:
1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM
The Court made the following:
2
ORDER:
This Court, vide order dated 01.12.2023 in W.P.No.31028 of 2023, has disposed of the Writ Petition, directing the writ petitioner to prefer an appeal under Rule 33 of the A.P. (C.C.A.) Rules within a period of one week from the date of order and, on filing such appeal by the writ petitioner, the respondents were directed to dispose of the said appeal within two weeks thereof with an observation, failing which the impugned proceedings deemed to be suspended.
Accordingly, the petitioner herein filed an appeal before the appellate authority on 05.12.2023 and the same was considered and rejected by the respondent authorities on 22.12.2023. The respondents have complied the orders of this Court and the appeal filed by the writ petitioner was disposed of. The party-in-person (writ petitioner) might have filed the Contempt Case with wrong assumption on obtaining wrong advice.
Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 04.04.2025 siva
3
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.549 of 2025
Date: 04.04.2025
siva