MR.VANTAL KESHAVARAO v. THE STATE BY ANNAPOORNESHWARINAGAR POLICE STATION
CRL.P/12292/2024 · 2025-02-19
M G Uma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34960 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34960 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7549 CRL.P No. 12292 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 12292 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
MR. VANTAL KESHAVARAO S/O. APPALASWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS R/AT:- KADAPARAYA VILLAGE CHINTAPALLI POST VISHAKAPATNAM ANDRA PRADESH …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KIRAN S.S., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
THE STATE BY ANNAPOORNESHWARINAGAR POLICE STATION BENGALURU RURAL REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ATTACHED HIGH COURT BUILDING BANGALORE - 560 001 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VENKAT SATHYANARAYAN, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 CR.PC (FILED U/S 483 BNSS) PRAYING TO ENLARGE THE PETITIONER ON BAIL IN CR.NO.52/2022 REGISTERED BY THE ANNAPOORNESHWARI NAGAR P.S. BENGALURU CITY RESPONDENT POLICE AND NOW IN SPL.C.C.NO.1994/2022 PENDING BEFORE THIS HONBLE COURT FOR OFFENCE P/U/S 20(B)(II) C OF THE NDPS ACT ON THE FILE OF THE 5TH ADDL.C.M.M BENGALURU.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA
Digitally signed by SWAPNA V Location: high court of karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:7549 CRL.P No. 12292 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation even when the matter is passed over twice and again called at 3.45 p.m.
2. The order sheet dated 09.12.2024 reads as under:
"Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. No representation. Even on the last date of hearing, there was no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford final opportunity, list this matter next week."
3. In spite of that, there is no representation. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition.
Hence, the petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE
*bgn/- CT:VS List No.: 2 Sl No.: 7