Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010252662025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6805/2025 JITU BHUYAN S/O- LATE KINARAM BHUYAN, R/O- BHOLAGURI SATRA, P.O.- PUBTHORIA, P.S.- KALIABOR, PIN- 782137, DIST.- NAGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM REVENUE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT (GENERAL) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:DIST. COMMISSIONER NAGAON ASSAM PIN- 782001 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT ASSAM BASISTHA GUWAHATI-29 5:THE SUPERINTENDENT ENGINEER NAGAON WATER RESOURCE CIRCLE NAGAON- 782003 6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NAGAON
Page No.# 2/3 WATER RESOURCE DIVISION NAGAON PIN- 782003 7:THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER NAGAON WATER RESOURCES SUB-DIVISION NAGAON PIN- 782003 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. K K CHOUDHURY, D KALITA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, WATER RESOURCE, SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 19.06.2026
Heard Ms. K.K. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri R.M. Das, learned Standing Counsel, Water Resource Department, Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department and Ms. U. Das, learned State Counsel. The matter pertains to a claim for disbursing contractual dues. Ms. Choudhury, the learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn the attention of this Court to the affidavit-in-opposition filed by the respondent no. 4 on 11.02.2026 in which the liability has been acknowledged. Shri Dutta, the learned Standing Counsel, Revenue Department has also placed before this Court written instructions dated 12.06.2026 as per which an amount of Rs.17,72,045/- (Rupees Seventeen Lakhs Seventy Two Thousand Forty Five only) has been approved and been allotted to the District
Page No.# 3/3 Commissioner, Nagaon and the process of Financial Sanction has been initiated after which Ceiling Proposal would be submitted to the Finance Department for approval and final disbursement. In view of the aforesaid development, this Court is of the opinion that there may not be any live cause of action to be adjudicated. Accordingly, while this writ petition is closed, the process of disbursement which has been undertaken is directed to be completed expeditiously and preferably within a period of 3 (three) months from today. JUDGE Comparing Assistant