1 2025:CGHC:17722 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 189 of 2019  Salem Girls Higher Secondary School Raipur, Through Its Principal Salem Girls, Higher Secondary Moti Bagh, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner Office Of Employees Provident Fund Organization Regional Office Block D Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavsaik Parisar, Pandri Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Central Board Of Trustees Employees Provident Fund Organization, Through The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Employees Provident Fund Organization, Regional Office, Block-D, Scheme No. 32, Indira Gandhi Vyavasayik Parisar, Pandri Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492004 (As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 01-07-2024) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Shyam Sundar Lal Tekchandani, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sunil Pillai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 17. 04.2025 1. Learned counsel for respondents would submit that order passed by respondent No. 1/authority is appealable according to provisions of Section 7-I of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. 2. At this stage, Mr. Tekchandani, Advocate would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer a duly constituted appeal before the appellate authority. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2025.04.17 17:53:47 +0530 2 3. As in the year 2019, appellate authority was not appointed; therefore, this petition was preferred and interim order was passed in favour of the petitioner. According to Mr. Pillai, at present, Central Government Industrial Tribunal is functioning. 4. Taking into consideration the above-discussed facts, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer a duly constituted appeal before the appellate authority within a period of 30 days along with an application for grant of stay and the appellate authority is directed to decide the application for grant of stay within further period of 30 days. 5. For period of 60 days, interim order granted earlier shall remain enforce. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge $iddhant