APHC010545462014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 217/2014 Between: 1. KESAVAPATNAM CHANDRASEKHAR, S/O. KRISHNA RAO, D.NO.57- 01-2012, DURGANAGAR, KANCHARAPALEM, VISAKHAPTANAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P ANOTHER, REP., BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P. AT HYDERABAD. 2. KESAVAPATNAM LEELA KUMARI ASHA, W/O. CHANDRASEKHAR, R/O. H.NO.47/B, GF-7, WAMBAY COLONY, MADHURAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to the order of the Judge, Family Court - cum - V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam dt.29.07.2013 in OP.No.818 of 2009 and to allow this revision by setting aside the same in the interest of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 376 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OP No.818 of 2009 on the file of the Judge, Family Court - cum - V Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Visakhapatnam during the pendency of the Criminal Revision Case in the interest of justice 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K JYOTHI PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: O R D E R 1. The Criminal Revision Case, under Section 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’) is filed on behalf of the petitioner/husband assailing the Order dated 29.07.2013 passed in F.C.O.P.No.818 of 2009 on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-V Additional District and Sessions Judge at Visakhapatnam (for short, ‘Sessions Judge’) whereby the learned Sessions Judge allowed the petition in-part, which was filed by the 2nd Respondent herein under Section 125 of Cr.P.C seeking maintenance. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner is present. None appeared on behalf of the Respondent No.2. 3. A report was received from the Secretary of the District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam, stating that Respondent No. 2, Kesavapatnam Leela Kumari @ Asha, stating in her statement that her husband, Kesavapatnam Chandrasekhar (the petitioner herein), passed away on 22.11.2021. She further stated that she had amicably resolved her matrimonial disputes with him outside the Court and obtained a divorce in the year 2013. Subsequently, in 2017, she entered into a second marriage with one K. Laxman, son of the late Krishna Rao. 4. A perusal of the report reveals that the matrimonial disputes between the petitioner and his wife were amicably settled, and that the petitioner had passed away on 22.11.2021. In the said facts of the case, this Court finds that cause does not survive. 3 5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as cause does not survive. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date: 23.07.2025 MS 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 217 of 2014 Date: 23.07.2025 MS