Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34951 (CHH)

ARVIND BANSOD v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4059/2022 · 2025-02-27

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:9897 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4059 of 2022 1 - Arvind Bansod S/o Late Sadaram Bansod Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Salhebhatti, Post Aundhi, Tahsil Manpur, District- Mohla- Manpur Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh., District : Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Tahsil-Manpur District- Mohla- Manpur Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Sub Divisional OfÏcer (Revenue) Mohla District- Mohla- Manpur Chowki Ambagarh Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Tahsildar Manpur, District- Mohla-Manpur Ambagarh, Chowki SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.02.28 17:26:41 +0530 2 Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Nayab Tahsildar Manpur District- Mohla- Manpur Ambagarh- Chowki Chhattisgarh. 6 - Rajaram S/o Late Ramji R/o Village Salhebhatti, Post Aundhi, Tahsil Manpur, District- Mohla-Manpur Ambagarh Chowki Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : None For Respondent/State : Ms. Anuja Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent no. 6 : Shri Puneet Ruparel, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board 27.02.2025 1. As no one appears to prosecute the matter on behalf of the petitioner, even in the second call and after considerable time, under the circumstances this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the case for want of prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Shoaib