[2025:RJ-JP:6542] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15941/2024 1. Satpal Singh S/o Guljar Singh, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gharsondhi, Police Station Chinnor, District Gwalior. (M.p.). (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Chhabra). 2. Chain Singh @ Bunty S/o Chhittarlal Gurjar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Kundi, Police Station Chhabra, Distt. Baran (Raj.). (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Chhabra). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 542/2025 Hajarilal S/o Tularam, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Jhanjhani, Police Station Harnavdashaji Dist. Baran Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is In Sub Jail Chhabra) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ali Mohd. Khan For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 14/02/2025 1. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.486/2024 registered at Police Station Chhabara, District Baran (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable unders Sections 8/15 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. Investigation is being [2025:RJ-JP:6542] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15941/2024] conducted for the offences punishable unders Sections 8/15 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity. Petitioners Satpal Singh & Chain Singh @ Bunty are in custody since 30.11.2024 and petitioner Hajarilal is in custody since 06.12.2024 and trial will take considerable time. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that alleged recovered contraband is below commercial quantity; period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners (1) Satpal Singh S/o Guljar Singh, (2) Chain Singh @ Bunty S/o Chhittarlal Gurjar & (3) Hajarilal S/o Tularam shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is [2025:RJ-JP:6542] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15941/2024] transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station. 8. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. 9. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner. In case the petitioner fails to mark their presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /371-372