CRM-M-14808-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-14808-2025 Date of decision: 19.03.2025 BAGICHA SINGH AND ANOTHER ….PETITIONER(S) Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV BERRY Present:- Mr. D.S. Virk, Advocate for the petitioners. ***** SANJIV BERRY, J.(ORAL) The instant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for seeking direction to the respondents not to harass and humiliate the petitioners and further not to implicate them in some false cases under the political pressure of local leaders of ruling party on the instigation of co- villagers. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, inter alia, contends that feeling aggrieved by the acts and conduct of respondents No.3 and 4, the petitioners had moved the representation 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala, wherein, no action has been taken by the concerned authorities till date. He further limited his request that for the purpose of the petition, the petitioners will be satisfied if appropriate directions are given to respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner. KANIKA 2025.03.21 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M-14808-2025 2 3. Notice of motion to official respondents. 4. On the asking of the Court, Mr. Ankit Grewal, DAG, Punjab, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the State-respondents No. 1 to 3 and submits that the aforesaid representation will be disposed of in an expeditious manner in accordance with law. 5. After considering the rival contentions and considering the limited request made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without commenting on the merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with the direction to respondent No.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patiala, to consider and dispose of the representation dated 12.03.2025 (Annexure P-5) in accordance with law in an expeditious manner so as to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and if needed, provide requisite protection to their life and liberty. 6. The decision so taken be intimated to the petitioners. 7. Disposed of. (SANJIV BERRY) JUDGE 19.03.2025 kanika i) Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No ii) Whether reportable? Yes/No KANIKA 2025.03.21 10:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment