Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34945 (KAR)

SRI. BASAVANAIKA v. LATE RATHNAMMA @ SHARADAMMA

RSA/2095/2023 · 2025-09-11

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.2095 OF 2023 BETWEEN: SRI. BASAVANAIKA S/O SANNANAIKA, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O SY 27 AND 28, MALLAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKAVALANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT-571301. ...APPELLANT/S (By Sri./Smt : P MAHESHA, PRAREET JAIN, NIKITHA M., ADVOCATES) AND 1 . SMT. RATHNAMMA @ SHARADAMMA D/O SRINIVASA MURTHY, SINCE DEAD BY HER LR., SRI MAHESH KUMARA, S/O LATE RATHNAMMA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, …2 RSA NO. 2095/2023 2 R/O VAKKALAGERI, MALLAHALLI VILLAGE, KOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK. 2 . SRI. BANGARANAIKA S/O LATE DODDAMARINAIKA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 3 . SRI. KUMARA S/O LATE DODDAMARINAIKA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, RESPONDENTS 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT MALLAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT. 4 . SRI. MAHADEVANAIKA S/O KARINAIKA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT MALLAHALLI VILLAGE, DODDAKOWLANDE HOBLI, NANJANGUD TALUK …RESPONDENT/S (SRI SHARATH KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) REGULAR SECOND APPEAL FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 11.01.2022 …3 RSA NO. 2095/2023 3 PASSED IN RA NO.371/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, MYSURU, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.07.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.108/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, NANJANGUD. This Regular Second Appeal coming on for Orders, this day the Court made the following Order:- ORAL ORDER Finally, Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution, without reference to the Bench. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE : Vide Court Order dated 10.09.2024, office objections are not complied with hence, appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: SR R By: RG C By: CDJ Ty Date: 14.11.2024 C Date: 15.11.2024