APHC010548542013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26583/2013 Between: 1. SHAIK RIZWANA, PRAKASAM DIST., OCC: UNEMPLOYEE, R/O. 23- F-101, RAJU NAGAR COLONY, MARKAPUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE DIST COLLECTOR GUNTUR 3 OTRS, - 2. THE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, (DISTRICT LEVEL), REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND JOINT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR 3. THE TAHSILDAR, SATTANAPALLI MANDAL, SATTANAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. RAZIA BEGUM D/O SYDA SYED, R/O. 32-34-17/B, MASJID STREET, OPP.SRR COLLEGE, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to declare the delay and inaction on the part of the respondents in considering the application dated 19.8.2013 submitted by the petitioner for cancellation of Community Certificate issued by the respondent No.3 in favour of respondent No.4 as per section 5 of A.P. (Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribes and Backward Classes), Regulation of issue of ComMunity Certificate Act, 1993 and A.P. (Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and Backward Classes) Issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Rules, 1997 as arbitrary, illegal and consequently direct the respondents to 2 consider the application submitted by the petitioner for cancellation of the Community Certificate issued by the respondent No.3 in favour of Respondent No.4 forthwith in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 32894 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents to consider the application dated 19.8.2013 submitted by the petitioner in terms of section 5 of A.P. (Schedule Caste, Schedule Tribes and Backward Classes), Regulation of issue of Community Certificate Act, 1993 and A.P. (Schedule Castes, Schedule Tribes and Backward Classes) issue of Community, Nativity and Date of Birth Certificates Rules, 1997 forthwith, pending disposal of the writ petition in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE 2. MANDEM KRANTHI GIREESH 3. K UDAYA SRI 4. V PADMANABHA RAO The Court made the following ORDER: Sri M.Kranthi Gireesh, learned counsel representing Sri P.Nagendra Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ does not survive and rendered infructuous. 2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 09.07.2025 KA 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 26583/2013 Date: 09.07.2025 KA 4