1 2025:CGHC:50322-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1232 of 2021 1 - Sanjay Kumar S/o Shri Rajendra Prasad Gupta Aged About 44 Years Occupation-The -Than Senior Branch Manager Canara Bank Phool Chowk Branch Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Shailesh Parmar S/o Rajesh Kumar Parmar Aged About 33 Years R/o The Than OfÏcer Canara Bank Phool Chowk Branch Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Pradipta Kumar Tripathi S/o Lt. Dinabandhu Tripathi Aged About 62 Years Retired Divisional Manager Regional OfÏce, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Amarjeet Singh S/o S. Joginder Singh Aged About 62 Years Retired Deputy General Manager Canara Bank Regional OfÏce, Naya Raipur (Chhattisgarh) (Canara Bank C. O. Legal Section Circle OfÏce Bhopal Had Authorized To Move The Present Crmp Petition Before This Hon'ble Court) ... Petitioner(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2025.10.10 10:48:39 +0530 2 versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Secretary Home Department, Mahanadi Bhavan Mantralaya New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - Superintendent Of Police Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Station House OfÏcer Police Station Maudhapara, Raipur, District-Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 4 - H. R. Grandsons And Company Through Partnere Vaibhav Shukla S/o Shri Pramod Shukla, R/o Salasaar Greens Sarona, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 492001 ... Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) :Shri Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate. For Respondents/State :Shri Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. For Respondent no. 4 :Shri Surfuraj Khan, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 09.10.2025 1. The present Cr.M.P. has been filed with the following prayer:- “ It is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this petition and may 3 further be pleased to quash the FIR No. 0155 dated 23.10.2021 has been filed at Police Station Modhapara, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) in the interest of justice.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the respondent pointed out that the charge sheet has been filed before the learned trial Court. 3. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioners seek to withdraw this petition with a liberty to take recourse to law. 4. Accordingly, the instant Cr.M.P. is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as stated supra. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Shoaib