2025:JHHC:32094 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.985 of 2025 ------- 1. Kamalkant Soren, aged about 50 years, S/o Late Tumku Soren, resident of Village Kushberia, P.O. Ojhadih, P.S.- Sarath, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand) 2. Sitalal Soren, aged 48 years, S/o Late Sonaram Soren, resident of Village Raghunathpur, P.O. Jagdishpur, P.S.- Madhupur, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 3. Baleshwar Soren, aged about 52 years, S/o Late Tumku Soren, resident of Village Kushberia, P.O. Ojhadih, P.S.- Sarath, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand) 4. Dhrublal Marandi, aged about 54 years S/o Late Budhan Marandi, resident of Village Badiya, P.O. Kasathi, P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 5. Basant Hansda, aged 48 years, S/o Late Pandu Hansda, resident of Village Sahajpur, P.O. Shitalpur, P.S. Karmatanr, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) 6. Subodhan Tudu, aged 57 years, S/o Late Nunuwa Tudu, resident of Village Kadrudih, P.O. and P.S. Karmatanr, District - Deoghar (Jharkhand) 7. Dilip Kumar Marandi, aged 51 years, S/o Late Lodha Marandi, resident of Vill.- Alampur, P.O.& P.S.- Karon, District- Deoghar 8. Sita Ram Marandi, aged 43 yrs., S/o Sri Lolin Marandi, resident of Vill.- Dunmariya Bank, P.O.& P.S.- Karon, District- Deoghar 9. Babusal Tudu, aged 51 yrs., S/o Sri Roben Tudu, resident of Vill.-Pahrudih, P.O.-Asna, P.S. Palojori, District- Deoghar ...… Petitioner Versus (1) The State of Jharkhand (2) Sri Naman Priyesh Lakra, S/o not known to the petitioner, at present posted as the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, P.O & P.S.- Deoghar, District Deoghar (Jharkhand) …. Opp. Parties ------- 2025:JHHC:32094 2 CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN ------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anjani Kr. Verma, Adv. For the State : Ms. Amrita Banerjee, AC to G.P-I ------- 03/Dated:15.10.2025 1. A show-cause has been filed indicating therein that the reasoned order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar dated 05.06.2025, annexed as Annexure-C. 2. Having regard to the aforesaid development, the instant application is disposed of with the liberty to the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order, if so advised. (Deepak Roshan, J.) October 15, 2025 Fahim/- Uploaded on 17/10/2025