Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34932 (JHR)

UMESH CHANDRA SHARMA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./6127/2025 · 2025-10-16

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:32142 --1-- A.B.A. No. 6127 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 6127 of 2025 ---- 1. Umesh Chandra Sharma, aged about 55 years, S/o Mani Lal Sharma, R/o – Godidih, PO – Chiksiya, PS – Chas Muffasil, District – Bokaro 2. Vivek Sharma, aged about 33 years, S/o Shakti Pad Sharma, R/o Chamsobad, PO – Khamarbendi, PS – Chas Muffasil, District – Bokaro 3. Samir Kumar Supkar, aged about 55 years, S/o Binod Chand Supakar, R/o – Sonardih, PO – Salkera Katras, PS – Katras, District – Dhanbad 4. Nimai Sharma, aged about 41 years, S/o Arjun Nath Sharma, R/o Chamsobad, PO – Khamarbendi, PS – Chas Muffasil, District – Bokaro 5. Nitu Supkar, aged about 41 years, W/o Samir Kumar Supkar, R/o Sonardih, PO – Malkera Katras, PS – Katras, District – Dhanbad 6. Arti Devi, aged about 73 years, W/o Adhar Banerjee, R/o Village and PO – Pathuria, PS – Jaridih, District – Bokaro 7. Bull Rani, aged about 75 years, W/o Binod Chandra Supakar, R/o – Sonardih, PO – Malkera Katras, PS – Katras, District - Dhanbad .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Arwind Kumar, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Satish Prasad, Advocate ---- 04/16.10.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2025:JHHC:32142 --2-- A.B.A. No. 6127 of 2025 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No.76 of 2020, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 406, 413, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B) and 34 of Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that petitioner Nos.1 to 5 are purchasers of the land in question and petitioner Nos. 6 and 7 have sold the said land to petitioner Nos.1 to 5. He further submits that the deed writer namely Sita Ram Gorain has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.8706 of 2022. He then submits that the allegations are made that the land purchased by the informant has been further sold and purchased by petitioner Nos.1 to 5 and sold by the petitioner Nos.6 and 7. He also submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegation is there of purchasing of the said land of the informant. 5. Considering that petitioner Nos.1 to 5 are purchasers and petitioner Nos.6 and 7 have sold the said land and deed writer namely Sita Ram Gorain has been granted anticipatory bail in ABA No.8706 of 2022 and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.9 of the petition, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2025:JHHC:32142 --3-- A.B.A. No. 6127 of 2025 6. Accordingly, the petitioners, above named, are hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of their surrender/arrest, the petitioners, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each, with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bokaro in connection with Chas (M) P.S. Case No.76 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 16.10.2025 Sangam/