- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1482 CRL.A No. 2294 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2294 OF 2023 (U/S 14(A) (2)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI NAGARAJU N B, S/O BEERALINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND OLD NANJANAGUD TOWN POLICE STATION, NAYANA KSHATRIYA STREET, NANJANAGUDU TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 302. 2. SRI RAJU, S/O LATE KARIGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT DEVIRAMMANAHALLI HUNDI VILLAGE, KASABA HOBLI, NANJANAGUDU TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT - 571 302. 3. SRI BHAIRAVA MURTHY, S/O LATE MAHADEVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, R/AT SHREERAMPURA, 4TH CROSS, NANJANAGUDU TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 302. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI GURURAJ K JOSHI., ADVOCATE(ABSENT)) Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1482 CRL.A No. 2294 of 2023 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE POLICE OF RAMANAGARA TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANAGARA TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT - 562 159. REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDINGS, HIGH COURT BANGALORE - 01. 2. SRI KRISHNA NAYAKA, S/O DHYAVAPPA, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/AT BEHIND OLD NANJANAGUD TOWN POLICE STATION, NAYANA KSHATRIYA STREET, NANJANAGUDU TOWN, MYSURU DISTRICT - 571 302. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI CHANNAPPA ERAPPA, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.A. FILED U/S 14(A)(2) OF SC/ST (POA) ACT, 2015 BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE APPELLANT/S PRAYING THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ALLOW THIS APPEAL BY SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER IN CRL.MISC.NO.779/2022 PASSED BY THE 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT RAMANAGARA AND ENLARGE THE APPELLANTS ON BAIL IN SPL.C.C.NO.73/2022 FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S 302, 201 AND 202 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC AND U/S 3(2)(va) OF SC/ST (PA) AMENDMENT ACT, 2015 REGISTERED BY RESPONDENT POLICE STATION, NOW PENDING ON THE FILE OF 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE AT RAMANAGARA IN SPL.C.C.NO.73/2022. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1482 CRL.A No. 2294 of 2023 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellant. 2. The present appeal came to be filed on 01.12.2023. Till today, the office objections are not complied with. Even on the last date of the hearing, this Court noted the absence of the counsel for the appellant and suo moto granted a week's time to cure the office objections as a last time. Even after the said order, the office objections are not complied with for more than a two and half months. 3. Accordingly, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE THM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13