Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34927 (HP)

PALDAN NARGU v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/7706/2025 · 2025-12-12

Ajay Mohan Goel

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:HHC:43257 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.7706 of 2025 Decided on: 12.12.2025 Sh. Paldan Nargu … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & others … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 ____________________________________________________ _ For the petitioner : Ms. Heena Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Pramod Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.3. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this petition, the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following reliefs:- “a) Writ of mandamus may kindly be passed thereby directing the respondents not to attach and auction the moveable and immoveable properties of the petitioner. b) Writ of prohibition may kindly be issued against the respondents thereby restraining them from passing adverse orders against the petitioner.” 2. Today, the Court stands informed that the amount as was due from the petitioner to the respondent-Bank stands liquidated on 21.11.2025. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:43257 3. In light of this fact, this petition is disposed of by taking on record the factum of the loan amount having been liquidated. Obviously, as the loan amount stands liquidated by the petitioner, there is no occasion now for the Bank to attach or auction the movable and immovable property of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge December 12, 2025 (Rishi)