Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3492 (RAJ)

AASHISH S/O CHHITARMAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/624/2025 · 2025-01-15

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 624/2025 Aashish S/o Chhitarmal, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Subash Nagar, Railway Colony, Sawai Madhopur, Police Station Kotwali, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girish Khandelwal For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Ms. Manju Dave, PP Mr. Khizer Iqbal Khan HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 15/01/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused- petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.120/2024 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Sawai Madhopur for the offence(s) under Sections 87, 78(2), 64(2)(m) and 351(2) of B.N.S. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix have entered into marriage and the said marriage was registered. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix are in consensual relationship and thereafter, they agreed to marry with each other. It is also contended that the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix also sought protection order from the High Court and vide order dated 10.12.2024, the concerned Nodal Officer was directed to ensure that after (2 of 2) [CRLMB-624/2025] analyzing the threat perception if necessitated, it may pass necessary orders, providing adequate security and protection to the accused-petitioner and the prosecutrix. It is also contended that the prosecutrix has entered into compromise with the accused-petitioner and agree to file written compromise and the same has been preferred in the impugned order dated 07.01.2025 passed by learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur. The accused- petitioner is in custody since 30.12.2024 and trial of the case will take considerable time, the bail may be granted to the accused- petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the complainant concedes that compromise has been arrived at between the parties and the complainant has no objection if, this bail application of the petitioner is allowed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the above facts, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Aashish S/o Chhitarmal in connection with FIR No. 120/2024 registered at Police Station Mahila Thana, District Sawai Madhopur, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -88