- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:11386 WP No. 31087 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 31087 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. DR K S BHARGAVA SO KV SUBBANNA AGED 49 YEARS R/A NO.316/1, SUDHA DENTAL CLINIC BH ROAD, THIPATURU, TUMKUR DISTRICT. 2. DR PRAVEEN KUAMR M A SO LATE M L ANNEGOWDA AGED 52 YEARS R/A PLAT NO.310 E SPRINGS SEASONS APARTMENS NO1 KALPANA CHAWLA ROAD RMV 2ND STAGE BHUPASANDRA BENGALURU 560094. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHARATH S GOGI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT BENGALRUU 560001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTSRICT BENGALRUU 560001. 3. THE TAHSILDAR YEALANKA TALUK Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:11386 WP No. 31087 of 2024 YELAHANKA BANGALROE 5600064 4. SRI C VENKATACHALAPATHI AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS S/O LATE CHINNAPPPA R/AT NO.228/1, 3RD MAIN OMBR LAYOUT CHIKKABANSASAVADI BANGALORE 560043. 5. SRI MANJUNATHA SO GANGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, 6. SRI NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS 7. SRI MUNIRAJU S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS 8. SRI NARAYANASWAMY S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS 9. SRI NGARAJU S/O GANGAIAH AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS (R-5 TO 9 ARE LRs., OF DECEASED SRI.GANGAIAH) R-5 TO 9 ALL ARE R/AT MEESIGANAHALLI VILLAGE JALA HOBLI, BENGALURU NORTH TALUK 562149 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SHIVA REDDY., AGA FOR R-1 TO R-3; SRI. RAHUL.S.REDDY., ADVOCATE FOR R-4; VIDE ORDER DATED:19.03.2025, NOTICE TO R-5 TO R-9 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO. LND (NCR) - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:11386 WP No. 31087 of 2024 CR/111/2023-24 DATED 05.07.2024 PASSED BY THE R-3 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A), ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. The impugned order is an order passed by the Thasildar. 2. It cannot be in dispute that as against the order passed by the Thasildar, an appeal would lie to the Assistant Commissioner in respect of the land in question. Consequently, Writ Petition is dismissed reserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal to the Assistant Commissioner, if so advised and if he is so entitled. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE HNM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 27