SMT UMADEVI BALIGAR v. BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE
WP/30426/2024 · 2025-01-09
S G Pandit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34912 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:732 WP No. 30426 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT WRIT PETITION NO.30426 OF 2024 (S-TR) BETWEEN:
SMT. UMADEVI BALIGAR, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER (ELE.) OFFICE OF THE C.E. (TVCC) B.B.M.P., N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.P. KULKARNI, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SRI. MANJUNATHA P.V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQAURE, BENGALURU-560 002, REPTD. BY ITS CHIEF COMMISSIONER
2.
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ADM.), BRUHATH BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE, N.R. SQUARE, BENGALURU-560 002.
Digitally signed by MARIGANGAIAH PREMAKUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:732 WP No. 30426 of 2024
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY, URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
SRI. NAVEEN CHANDRASHEKAR, AGA FOR R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. DIRECTION QUASHING THE OFFICE ORDER DATED 26.09.2024 ISSUED IN NO.B12(6)/P.R./162/24-25 PASSED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT HEREIN POSTING THE PETITIONER FROM THE POST OF SE(ELC.)-I TO THE OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ENGINEER (TVCC) BBMP, BEING ARBITRARY ERRONEOUS AND OPPOSED TO LAW EQUITY AND JUSTICE APART FROM BEING WITHOUT JURISDICTION AND WITHOUT AUTHORITY OF LAW (ANNEXURE-B) AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:732 WP No. 30426 of 2024
ORAL ORDER
Sri. S.P.Kulkarni, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri. Manjunatha.P.V., learned counsel for the petitioner after arguing the matter for some time, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the appropriate Authority.
2. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.
Sd/- (S.G.PANDIT) JUDGE
SMJ List No.: 1 Sl No.: 12