IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 213 CRM-M-14635-2025 Date of decision: April 05, 2025 RANJEET KUMAR TIWARY AND OTHERS ...Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANJARI NEHRU KAUL Present: Mr. Vineet Sehgal, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Karan Sharma, DAG, Punjab. Dr. Anand Bishnoi, Advocate for respondent No.2. MANJARI NEHRU KAUL, J. (ORAL) 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 BNSS, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.704 dated 02.11.2021 (Annexure P-1) under Sections 120-B, 406, 420 of the IPC, registered at Police Station Sector 10, District Gurugram, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise (Annexure P-3). 2. Vide order dated 18.03.2025 of this Court, the parties were directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate on 24.03.2025 to get their statements recorded regarding the compromise arrived at, between them. 3. Report has since been received from learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Gurugram, in pursuance of the directions of this Court, wherein the factum of the compromise arrived at between the parties stands verified and Jaspreet Kaur 2025.04.05 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh CRM-M-14635-2025 -2- confirmed. As per the report, compromise has indeed been effected between the parties and the same is without any pressure or coercion and out of their free will, and the complainants have also made statement to the effect that they would have no objection if the FIR qua the accused-petitioners is quashed. 4. The trial Court has annexed photocopies of the statements of the parties, along with its report. 5. Learned State counsel too submits that there are no other accused other than the petitioners and respondent No.2 is the only aggrieved person in the FIR in question. 6. In view of the report of the learned trial Court, and the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and others (2012) 10 SCC 303, and also by the Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and another, 2007(3) RCR (Criminal) 1052, the instant petition is allowed. The aforesaid FIR and all consequential proceedings arising out of it, are quashed. 7. Needless to say the parties shall remain bound by the terms of compromise and their statements recorded before the Court below. April 05, 2025 (MANJARI NEHRU KAUL) Jaspreet Kaur JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Jaspreet Kaur 2025.04.05 14:37 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh