No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1 No. 1532 of 2025 Hon ’ble Alok Mah r a, J. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate for the applicant. 2. Mr. V.S. Pal, A.G.A. for the State. 3. The applicant – Fazlu Rahman @ Aada, who is in judicial custody in connection with FIR/ Case Crime No. 101 of 2025, under Sections 351(2), 351(3), 352 of BNS and Sections 13 and 14 of POCSO Act and Section 67, 67A, 67B of IT Act, registered at P.S.- Kaliyar Sharief @ Kaliyar, District Haridwar, has sought his release on bail. 4. In this case, an FIR was lodged by the complainant, wherein, she has alleged that the applicant and the complainant married on 17.12.2020 and thereafter divorce between them took place on 10.04.2021. After the divorce, the complainant was living in her parental house, but, the applicant posted the animated and edited nude photographs of the complainant as well as other family members of the complainant is the social media and threatened her that if she does not come back to live with the applicant, then he would defame her in the whole society. Thereafter, chargesheet was filed against the applicant under Sections 351(2), 351(3), 352 of BNS and Sections 13 and 14 of POCSO Act and Section 67, 67A, 67B of IT Act. 5. Per contra, learned State Counsel vehemently opposed the bail application and would submit that the offence alleged is of a grave and heinous nature. It is further submitted that State have filed their counter affidavit in the matter, wherein, it is submitted that after investigation, it was found that the allegations levelled against the applicant in the FIR, are prima facie made out at this stage of bail and the Investigating Officer on the basis of credible material evidence has filed the chargesheet against the applicant. Therefore, the present bail application is liable to be dismissed. 6. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 7. Since, perusal of the content of the FIR and Sections of the FIR reflects the offence to be of very serious and heinous nature, and, further, in the counter affidavit filed by the State, it is submitted that after investigation, it was found that the allegations levelled against the applicant in the FIR, are prima facie made out at this stage of bail, this Court is of the view that there is no good ground to enlarge the applicant on bail at this stage and the present bail application deserves to be rejected. 8. The present bail application is rejected. ( Alok Mah r a J.) 18.03.2026 Ujjwal