1 APHC010547802024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 28727/2024 Between: 1. M/S. MALLI SAI ENTERPRISES, REP. BY ITS PROPRIETOR S. MADAN KUMAR S/O. S. SAI BABA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O. H. NO. 15-212, SUBEDHARPETA, NELLORE, 524001 ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING AND COOPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE MARKETING GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, OLD MIRCHI YARD, NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER AM, 0/0 COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE MARKETING GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, AGRICULTURAL DEPARTMENT, OLD MIRCHI YARD, NALLAPADU ROAD, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, (ARGICULTURAL MARKETING WING), NELLORE DISTRICT AT NELLORE. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, AGRICULTURAL MARKETING, GUNTUR. 2 7. THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE, BAPATLA, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 8. THE AGRICULTURAL MARKETING COMMITTEE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ANNAMNEEDI BALAKRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR AGRICULTURE 2. Gangisetty Rajeswara rao,Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri D. Rama Koteswara Rao, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Annamneedi Balakrishna, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and Sri Krishna Kishore, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture. 2. Sri Krishna Kishore, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Agriculture has submitted the Written Instructions from the Office of Respondent No.3 through the Superintending Engineer (M) FAC, dated 21.04.2025 along with certain documents. Copy of it is supplied to the Counsel for the Writ Petitioner as well and the same is taken on record. 3. The Written Instruction would indicate that the dues of the Writ Petitioner have been settled fully and finally. 4. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions from his client, submits that his client has received the full amount. He would submit that in view of the fact that the grievance of the Writ Petitioner has been redressed by payment of amount, no cause survives in this Writ Petition. 3 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of since no further cause of action survives. No order as to costs. 6. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 22.04.2025 Vns