Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 34886 (RAJ)

JOGENDRA SINGH @ JOGENDRA DALAL S/O SHRI OMPRAKASH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15963/2024 · 2025-04-21

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:16671] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 15963/2024 Jogendra Singh @ Jogendra Dalal S/o Shri Omprakash, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Chidi, Police Station Lakhan Manjara, District Rohtak. Currently R/o 133 B/29, Ramgopal Colony, Police Station Urban Estate, Rohtak, District Rohtak, Haryana. (Presently Accused Petitioner Is Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Madhav Mitra, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Jaya Mitra For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 21/04/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.0012/2024 registered at Police Station-Special Police Station (SOG), District- ATS and SOG for the offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B of IPC and 3, 7 and 10 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2022 & 66D of Information Technology (Amendment), Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner was working as a Chairperson of OPSJ University but he has resigned from the post of Chairperson in the year 2015, which [2025:RJ-JP:16671] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-15963/2024] has been accepted by the Board. The petitioner does not have authority to put his signature on any document. He further submits that the petitioner is suffering from Sleep apnea (OSA) and he is behind the Bar since 30.04.2023. Charge-sheet has been filed and the offences is triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that the petitioner is owner of the University and as per charge-sheet filed, he is facing charges for distributing the fake degrees with dishonest intention of certain consideration. 5. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am not inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is dismissed. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Sunita/35