THE GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION v. NAGOTHI APPALARAJU
WA/999/2024 · 2025-07-02
Dhiraj Singh Thakur, R Raghunandan Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34885 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34885 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
y y y y APHC010544982024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI S otMUip ■y THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY P | TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE ^ ^ PRESENT HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT APPEAL NO: 999 OF 2024 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 08.05.2024 in W.P.No.21699 of 2021 Court. Between:
1. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Commissioner, Visakhapatnam
2. The Zonal Commissioner Corporation, Zone-ll, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam. -0 H 33 & on the file of the Hon’ble High Rep. by its Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENT Nos.2 to 3 AND
1. Nagothi Appalaraju, S/o. late Tatabbai, Aged about 36 years, R/o. D. No.7-176, Revallapalem Village, Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam District.
...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Municipal and Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT No.1 lA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 08.05.2024 passed in W.P.No.21699 of 2021 by allowing the instant writ appeal. Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A. S. C. BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS) Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI V. SAI KUMAR, representing^ M/s. A. VARALAKSHMI Counsel for the Respondent No.2:GP FOR MUNICIPAL ^ ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT The Court made the following: JUDGMENT
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI Bench Sr.No:-26 [3446] APHC010544982024 74 WRIT APPEAL NO: 999 of 2024 The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation and others ...Appellants Vs. Nagothi Appalaraju and others ...Respondents ********** Advocate for appellants Sri A. S. C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporations. Sri V. Sai Kumar,
learned counsel representing Ms. A. Varalakshmi. Advocate for respondents
CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO DATE : 3rd July 2025 P C :
Learned counsel for respondent No. 1/writ petitioner states that the order passed by the learned single Judge in W.P.No.21699 of 2021 dated 08.05.2024 has since been complied with rendering the present writ appeal infructuous. Accordingly, the Writ Appeal is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
2. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
Sd/- M. RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri A. S. C. Bose (SC for Municipal Corporations) [OPUCI
2. One CC to M/s. A Varalakshmi, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration and Urban Developijrent, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies. ssb
L V, ' HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025
ORDER WA No. 999 OF 2024 ^ t7JUL2025 V« y&. ik^SJjiiTent SectjoaXl^/ DISPOSING OF THE W.P. AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS