IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2005 of 2025 Date of Decision: 29.10.2025 _______________________________________________________ Smt. Mamta Sharma …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors. … Respondent s Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Pranav Kaushal, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of office order dated 26.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Dy. Director of School Education (Elem.) Solan, District Solan, Himachal Pradesh, learned counsel for the petitioner fairly states that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands complied with. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid order, which is taken on record, this Court finds that mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, stands duly complied with, as such, nothing 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge October 29, 2025 (sunil)