IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.2668 of 2025 Date of Decision: 24.12.2025 _______________________________________________________ Rakesh Thakur …….Petitioner Versus The Chairman-cum-Managing Director & Ors. … Respondents _______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Parav Sharma & Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Digvijay Singh, Advocate, for respondents No.1 & 2. Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.3-State. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record bank statements, learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2, states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, sought to be executed, sum of Rs.11715396.48 has been paid to the petitioner along with interest. 2. Having carefully perused aforesaid documents, which are taken on record, this Court finds merit in the contention of learned counsel for respondents No.1 & 2, as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and accordingly, the same is 1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 disposed of reserving liberty to the petitioner to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law, qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge December 24, 2025 (sunil)