RAMISETTY BHULAKSHMI & 3 ORS. v. SRI TAJ MOHAMMAD KHAN & 3 ORS.
MACMA/3324/2012 · 2025-02-07
V R K Krupa Sagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34879 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 34879 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 APHC010546002012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3365] FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE DR V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 3324/2012 Between: Ramisetty Bhulakshmi & 3 Ors. and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Sri Taj Mohammad Khan 3 Ors and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S):
1. N SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. NAGUMANTRI NAGESWARA RAO
2. . The Court made the following:
2
JUDGMENT :
01. The learned counsel for respondent No.4 alone is present. No representation for appellant. After recording the details of earlier proceedings, this Court on 03.02.2025 directed the matter to be listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today there is no representation for appellant.
02. In the result, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any, stand closed. _____________________________________ JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
Date :07.02.2025 GRL
3
79
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE DR.V.R.K.KRUPA SAGAR
M.A.C.M.A No.3324 of 2012
Date: 07.02.2025
GRL.